cheri

border

“Setting words written down may be the tactic of a secret bully,” as well as other selections from Why I Write

“Setting words written down may be the tactic of a secret bully,” as well as other selections from Why I Write

The question of what propels creators, especially great creators, may be the subject of eternal fascination and cultural curiosity. The curtain on one of the most celebrated and distinctive voices of American fiction and literary journalism to reveal what it is that has compelled her to spend half a century putting pen to paper in”Why I Write,” originally published in the New York Times Book Review on December 5, 1976 and found in The Writer on Her Work, Volume 1 (public library), Joan Didion—whose indelible insight on self-respect is a must-read for all—peels.

Of course I stole the title with this talk, from George Orwell. One reason I stole it was I write that I like the sound of the words: Why. There you have got three short unambiguous words that share a sound, and the sound they share is it: I I I In many ways writing could be the act of saying I, of imposing oneself upon other individuals, of saying listen to me, view it my way, change your mind. It really is an aggressive, even a hostile act. You are able to disguise its qualifiers and tentative subjunctives, with ellipses and evasions —with the complete method of intimating as opposed to claiming, of alluding rather than stating—but there isn’t any making your way around the reality that setting words in writing is the tactic of a secret bully, an invasion, an imposition of this writer’s sensibility regarding the reader’s most space that is private.

She continues on to attest to your character-forming importance of living the questions and trusting that even the meaningless moments will soon add up to one’s becoming:

I experienced trouble graduating from Berkeley, not due to this inability to manage ideas—I was majoring in English, and I also could locate the house-and-garden imagery in The Portrait of a Lady plus the person that is next ‘imagery’ being by definition the type of specific that got my attention—but due to the fact I experienced neglected to take a training course in Milton. I did so this. For reasons which now sound baroque I needed a qualification because of the end of the summer, plus the English department finally agreed, me proficient in Milton if I would come down from Sacramento every Friday and talk about the cosmology of Paradise Lost, to certify. Used to do this. Some Fridays I took the bus that is greyhound other Fridays I caught the Southern Pacific’s City of san francisco bay area from the last leg of its transcontinental trip. I’m able to no more let you know whether Milton put the sun or the earth in the center of his universe in Paradise Lost, the central question of at least one century and an interest about which I wrote 10,000 words that summer, but I will still recall the precise rancidity of this butter into the City of San Francisco’s dining car, additionally the way the tinted windows regarding the Greyhound bus cast the oil refineries around Carquinez Straits into a grayed and light that is obscurely sinister. In a nutshell my attention was always on the periphery, on which i possibly could see and taste and touch, on the butter, and the bus that is greyhound. During those years I happened to be traveling about what I knew to be a tremendously passport that is shaky forged papers: I knew that I was no legitimate resident in just about any world of ideas. I knew i really couldn’t think. All I knew then was the thing I couldn’t do. All I knew then was the thing I was not, also it took me some years to custom-writings realize what I was.

That was a writer.

A person whose most absorbed and passionate hours are spent arranging words on pieces of paper by which I mean not a ‘good’ writer or a ‘bad’ writer but simply a writer. Had my credentials held it’s place in order i might not have become a writer. Had I been blessed with even limited access to my own mind there could have been no reason at all to write. I write entirely to learn what I’m thinking, the things I’m looking at, what I see and what it means. The things I want and what I fear. Why did the oil refineries around Carquinez Straits seem sinister in my opinion in the summer of 1956? Why have the night lights in the bevatron burned during my mind for two decades? What is happening within these pictures in my mind?

She stresses the power of sentences while the fabric that is living of:

Grammar is a piano I play by ear, since I seem to have been away from school the the rules were mentioned year. All i am aware about grammar is its infinite power. To shift the dwelling of a sentence alters this is of that sentence, as definitely and inflexibly given that position of a camera alters the meaning of this object photographed. Many people realize about camera angles now, although not so many realize about sentences. The arrangement associated with the expressed words matters, and also the arrangement you need are available in the image in your head. The image dictates the arrangement. The picture dictates whether this will be a sentence with or without clauses, a sentence that ends hard or a dying-fall sentence, long or short, active or passive. The image tells you how exactly to arrange the words as well as the arrangement associated with words informs you, or tells me, what are you doing in the picture. Nota bene.